In the ISC, which of the following is a valid action regarding software installations?

The correct choice highlights that only installations approved by SailPoint are valid within the context of the Identity Security Cloud (ISC). This is crucial because maintaining a secure environment is paramount, and using only approved software ensures that vulnerabilities are minimized. SailPoint conducts comprehensive evaluations of software to assess its security posture, compatibility, and integration capabilities within the ISC framework. By restricting installations to only those that have received SailPoint's approval, the organization can better manage risks associated with unverified or potentially harmful software.

This approach also aligns with best practices for IT security, as third-party tools may introduce unforeseen security risks, compatibility issues, or performance degradation. Therefore, relying solely on approved installations ensures a more controlled and stable environment, helping to safeguard sensitive data and maintain compliance with industry regulations.

While the other choices address various aspects of software management, they do not align with the necessary governance and security measures required in a platform like ISC. For instance, permitting any third-party tool without proper vetting could lead to significant vulnerabilities. Similarly, allowing user-defined installation methods could result in inconsistencies and potential security gaps. Lastly, while avoiding unsupported software is prudent, the emphasis on approved installations reinforces a proactive security stance above merely avoiding risks.